Login Contact Us
E-ISSN : 2148-9696
Crescent Journal of
Medical and Biological Sciences
Jan 2026, Vol 13, Issue 4
Advanced Search
Title
Authors
Keyword
Poll
How do you find the scientific quality of the published articles on our web site?
Review
The Effect of Virtual Psychological Interventions on Anxiety and Depression in the Perinatal Period: A Systematic Review of Internet-Delivered Smartphone Apps and Chatbot-Based Programs
Shiva Shamsdanesh1, Masoumeh Simbar2, Hedyeh Riazi2, Mahrokh Dolatian2, Esmat Mehrabi3
1Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Midwifery and Reproductive Health Research Center, Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3Department of Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

DOI: 10.34172/cjmb.3998
Viewed : 18 times
Downloaded : 40 times.

Keywords : Anxiety, Depression, Virtual psychological interventions, Perinatal, Digital health
Full Text(PDF) | Related Articles
Abstract
Background: Anxiety and depression during the perinatal period can negatively impact maternal and infant well-being. Identifying effective approaches to promote perinatal mental health is important. Although previous reviews have examined digital psychological interventions, evidence across different virtual modalities, particularly chatbot-based interventions, remains limited. We aimed to systematically synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of virtual psychological interventions for anxiety and depression during the perinatal period.

Methods: Published studies in Persian and English were searched from inception to February 2026 in Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, SID, and Magiran. The review was reported in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing virtual psychological interventions for anxiety and/or depression during the perinatal period. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 1), and certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

Results: Of 3,976 records identified, 23 RCTs involving 4,133 women were included. Studies were categorized as internet/web-based (11 studies), telephone-based (3 studies), and mobile app- and chatbot-based (9 studies). Twelve studies assessed depression in 2,456 women, and 11 studies assessed depression and anxiety in 1,677 participants. Overall, the included studies generally reported reductions in depression and/or anxiety symptoms following virtual psychological interventions compared with usual care.

Conclusions: Virtual psychological interventions may reduce perinatal depression and anxiety symptoms. However, the certainty of evidence was low, with substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity. Further well-designed RCTs are needed.

Registration: This study was registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD420261279726).

 

Cite By, Google Scholar

Google Scholar

Articles by Shamsdanesh S
Articles by Simbar M
Articles by Riazi H
Articles by Dolatian M
Articles by Mehrabi E

PubMed

Articles by Shiva Shamsdanesh
Articles by Masoumeh Simbar
Articles by Hedyeh Riazi
Articles by Esmat Mehrabi

Submit Paper
Online Submission System
CJMB ENDNOTE ® Style Tutorials Publication Charge Medical and Biological Research Center About Journal
Publication Information
Publisher
Aras Part Medical International Press Editor-in-Chief
Arash Khaki
Deputy Editor
Zafer Akan
Published Article Statistics